Language in the Judicial Process

Author’s summary of:

Separate and unequal: The linguistic legitimation of legal ideology.

An attempt to establish the connections between the ‘micro’ linguistic resources and the ‘macro’ categories of gender, power and legal/ sociocultural ideology in the American context. The approach is multidisciplinary: discourse, sociolinguistics, gender, political economy, power, ethnography, feminist legal scholarship, legal semiotics, Foucauldian discourse, power and knowledge, Bakhtinian genre. Uses Ochs’ model of indexing gender relations, Foucault’s idea of discursive shifts, Sherzer’s discourse-centred approach to society and culture, and Benson’s semiotic interpretation of law. The data are five Supreme Court cases: Bradwell vs. Illinois (1973), Muller vs. Oregon (1908), Reed vs. Reed (1971), Roe vs.Wade (1973), and J.E.B. vs. Alabama (1994).



The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Big Orange. Big Ideas.

Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 | 865-974-1000
The flagship campus of the University of Tennessee System